Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Urban Renewal & Community Development Agency of Paducah

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 11, 1968PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT REED, Special Commissioner.

This is an appeal from an order adjudging that the Urban Renewal Agency of Paducah has a right to condemn real property owned by the appellants.

The Agency, appellee herein, brought suit in the McCracken Circuit Court pursuant to KRS Chapter 99. The appellants maintained that their property was not properly located in the redevelopment project area and that appellee had no right to condemn and take their property. Both the landowners and the Agency excepted to the appraisal made by the commissioners appointed by the circuit court. The landowners raised the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cartmell v. Urban Renewal & Community Development Agency of the City of MaysvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1968

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Urban Renewal & Community Development Agency of Louisville v. International Harvester Co. of DelawareCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API