Legal Opinion
Cartmell v. Urban Renewal & Community Development Agency of Maysville
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided June 14, 1968PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
STEINFELD, Judge.
Pursuant to Chapter 99 of the Kentucky Revised Statutes an urban renewal and redevelopment agency was created in the City of Maysville. Being unable to contract with the several appellants, it brought suit in the circuit court to condemn their three houses and the land on which they are situated. KRS 99.420(1). They are located in a redevelopment project area. The owners insist that the agency has no right to take their property. After extensive litigation, some of which was discussed in Cartmell v. Urban Renewal and Community Development Agency, etc., Ky., 419 S.W.2d 719…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Drury v. FrankeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Hart v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
- Brewer v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
- Collins v. Commonwealth, Department of HighwaysCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1959
- Stillpass v. Kenton County Airport Board, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cartmell v. Urban Renewal & Community Development Agency of the City of MaysvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1968