Legal Opinion

Idol v. Knuckles

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 6, 1964PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WADDILL, Commissioner.

The Urban Renewal and Community Development Agency of the City of Mid-dlesboro instituted an action in the Bell Circuit Court to condemn petitioners’ property in accordance with KRS 99.420. By answer the petitioners challenged the right of the Agency to take their property and thus far no hearing on this issue has been asked or held. Meanwhile, the Agency has demanded under the provisions of KRS 99.420(9) that the court enter an interlocutory judgment awarding to it the possession, use and control of this property.

Petitioners now seek an order from this Court prohibiting…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Spahn v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  2. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  3. Miller v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1959
  4. Board of Barbers & Beautician Examiners v. Mayo State Vocational SchoolCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1953

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. God's Center Foundation, Inc. v. Lexington Fayette Urban County GovernmentCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2002
  2. City of Bowling Green v. CookseyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1992
  3. Cartmell v. Urban Renewal & Community Development Agency of the City of MaysvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1968
  4. Cartmell v. Urban Renewal & Community Development Agency of MaysvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1967
  5. City of Bowling Green v. CookseyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API