Legal Opinion · Dissent
Raleigh v. . Jordan
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided June 19, 1940PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1DissentStacy, C. J.
BARNHILL and WINBORNE, JJ., concur in dissent. This was a civil action instituted by the city of Raleigh under C. S., 7990, to enforce a lien for unpaid taxes for the years 1925 and 1926. Taxes for those years were levied on certain lots in the city of Raleigh then owned by J. R. Jordan and C. P. Grantham. These lots were subsequently acquired by the defendant, the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, in 1931.
The cause was heard upon an agreed statement of facts. The court below held that under the provisions of ch. 181, Public Laws of 1933, the taxes on this property for 1925 and 1926 were…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Illinois Cent. R. R. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
- State v. Champion Fibre Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Stone v. . Comrs. of StonevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Aplin v. O'ConnorMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Ingram v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
3Cited by4 opinions
- Raleigh v. . BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- City of Raleigh v. Mechanics & Farmers BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Armco Steel Corp. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Fertilizer Co. v. . Gill, Comr. of RevenueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945