Legal Opinion

Ingram v. Parrish

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 1, 1938No. 26972PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.

Emmie Ingram filed a claim with the Department of Industrial Relations for compensation from Earle Parrish, for the death of her husband while in the employ of said Parrish. At the hearing of said claim the evidence developed that Parrish did not employ enough men to come under the terms of the workmen’s compensation act, and E. T. Allen was made a party to the claim. The evidence as to E. T. Allen is to the effect that he employed more than ten men at his planing mill at Wrens, Georgia; that he owned what was known as the Harold tract of timber; that he had a contract with Parrish for sawing…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Scott v. MinorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Raleigh v. . JordanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. City of Raleigh v. JordanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API