Legal Opinion

City of Raleigh v. Mechanics & Farmers Bank

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 14, 1943PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.

Tbe plaintiff’s appeal brings up for review tbe ruling of tbe court below tbat in a suit to foreclose tbe statutory lien on abutting property, given tbe city for street improvements, tbe installments of tbe amounts assessed therefor wbicb are ten years past due are barred by tbe statute of limitations.

Tbe particular question posed is whether chapter 331, Public Laws 1929 (sec. 2717 [a], N. C. Code), should be construed to impose a limitation of ten years, in a foreclosure suit under C. S., 7990, as to all installments of tbe amounts assessed for street improvements wbicb are ten years overdue…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Knowlton v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Maguire v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. State v. . HumphriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. State v. . RevisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. State v. . EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Piedmont Canteen Service, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Hedrick v. GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Kinston v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Tarboro v. . ForbesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  5. Kornegay Family Farms LLC v. Cross Creek Seed, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API