Legal Opinion

Stone v. . Comrs. of Stoneville

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 15, 1936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

The plaintiffs except and assign error on the ground that the court below erred in failing to make the findings of fact and holdings of law requested by the plaintiffs in Judgment Nos. 1 and 2, and failing to sign same. We do not think these exceptions and assignments of error are borne out by the record.

The record discloses: (1) “The petitioners tendered Judgment No. 1 and requested the court to sign it. This the court refused to do, whereupon petitioners except.” (2) “Petitioners then tendered Judgment No. 2, and requested the court to sign the same; this the court refused to do. To this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. John v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  2. Sovereign Camp, Woodmen of the World v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mebane Graded School District v. County of AlamanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Raleigh v. . JordanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Tyndall v. Triangle Mobile Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. City of Raleigh v. JordanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API