Legal Opinion

Stevens v. Hollywood Towers & Condominium Ass'n

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 29, 2011No. Case No. 11 C 1657PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HARRY D. LEINENWEBER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Mary Jo and Ralph Stevens (hereinafter, collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) brought the instant suit contending that their Condo Board’s refusal to accommodate Mary Jo’s need for an emotional support animal forced them to sell their condo. The Defendants, Hollywood Towers Condominium Association, Joseph A. Armenio, Sudler Building Services LLC, and Sudler and Co., doing business as Sudler Property Management (hereinafter, collectively, the “Defendants”) have moved to dismiss for failure to state claims upon which relief…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Cheryl A. Gile v. United Airlines, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  4. McGrath v. FaheyIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Kolegas v. Heftel Broadcasting Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chavez v. AberDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2015
  2. Mazzini v. StrathmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Banks v. Gates Hudson & Associates, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2020
  4. Bass v. BrannenDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024
  5. Evans v. 210 East Pearson Condominium AssociationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API