Kimble v. Wilson
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Linn,
Miss Kimble, who was very seriously injured in a motor vehicle collision, brought suit and now complains of the refusal to take off nonsuits entered in favor of three of the defendants.
A nonsuit may be entered only in a clear case. If there is doubt of the inferences that may be drawn from the oral evidence, it must be submitted to the jury. In passing on a motion to nonsuit and in reviewing the refusal to take off a nonsuit, the oral evidence must be regarded in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, who must receive the benefit of every fact the jury might…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Koontz v. Messer & Quaker State Oil Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Joseph v. United Workers Assn.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Nebel v. BurrelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Lang v. HanlonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Keitz v. National Paving & Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- Bauman v. Royal Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Auel v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- DIPPEL v. BrunozziSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- General Equipment Manufacturers v. Westfield InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.