Legal Opinion
Town of Southington v. Commercial Union Insurance
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 22, 2000No. SC 16194PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
The sole issue in this certified appeal is whether a municipality that has accepted a subdivision performance bond may enforce the provisions of the *350bond pursuant to General Statutes §§ 8-25 and 8-26c (c),1 if no lots in the subdivision have been conveyed *351prior to the lapse of the subdivision approval. The plaintiff claims that the Appellate Court improperly con-*352eluded that, pursuant to § 8-26c (c), a municipality may only call a subdivision performance bond if lots have *353been conveyed prior to the expiration of the subdivision approval. We agree and, accordingly, we reverse…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Conway v. Town of WiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- United Illuminating Co. v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. AyalaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. ParmaleeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Fahy v. FahySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Glazer v. Dress Barn, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Ganim v. Smith & Wesson Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Harris v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.