Legal Opinion

State v. Parmalee

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 6, 1985No. 11596PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSantaniello, J.

The defendant, Thomas Parmalee, was convicted by a jury of second degree arson in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 1981) § 53a-112.1 At the time of the offense the statute provided that a person is guilty of second degree arson when he starts a fire “(1) [wjith intent to destroy or damage a building ... to collect insurance for such loss; and (2) such act subjects another person to a substantial risk of bodily injury or another building to a substantial risk of destruction or damage.” General Statutes § 53a-112 (a). At trial, the state introduced evidence that the fire started by the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Peck v. JacqueminSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Dukes v. DuranteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  3. State v. GrantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  4. State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  5. Town of Winchester v. Connecticut State Board of Labor RelationsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Conway v. Town of WiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  2. Turner v. TurnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. State v. RodgersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. Struckman v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  5. Rhodes v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API