Legal Opinion

Swift & Co. v. Colvert

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 16, 1924No. 13403PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion! by

JARMAN, C.

This action was commenced in the district court of Carter county by Swift & Company, fes plaintiff, against George W. Colvert, as defendant, to recover the sum of $1,108.07, balance alleged to be due under a contract for goods furnished. Judgment was rendered for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

For a defense the defendant pleads a contract of novation. On December 12, 1919, Swift & Company entered into a written contract with George W. Colvert whereby Colvert was to have the exclusive right to handle fertilizer products for Swift & Company at Fort Stockton, Tex.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gaar, Scott & Co. v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Burford v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Fuller v. StoutSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shiflet v. MarleyArizona Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Swift & Co. v. ColvertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API