Legal Opinion
Swift & Co. v. Colvert
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided August 2, 1927No. 16757PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEACH, C.
This action arose in the district court of Carter county, wherein Swift & Company sued Geo. W. Colvert for recovery of the sum of $1,108.07, alleged to be due the plaintiff for fertilizer furnished and consigned to defendant by plaintiff under written contract between the parties. Defendant filed his answer and amendments thereto, denying the allegations of plaintiff’s petition, and further alleged, in substance, that the indebtedness due plaintiff, if any, was due and owing by the estate of E. Barry by reason of a certain contract between defendant and the said E. Barry, wherein the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Continental Gin Co. v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Matheney v. City of El DoradoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
- Palmer v. NoeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Gunn v. FrybergerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Sherman v. Pacific Coast Pipe Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gasper v. MayerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Finley Lollar v. DeanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Walker v. McNealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Abbott v. National Bank of Commerce of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- School District. No. 62 v. School District No. 17Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.