Legal Opinion

Burford v. Hughes

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 15, 1919No. 9106PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error from District Court, Muskogee County; Chas. G. Watts, Judge. Action by Dora B. Hughes against G. E. Burford. Judgment for plaintif, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

An option was taken on the lands of Mrs. Hughes, defendant in error, wherein, upon payment of a sum approximating $3,200, she was to execute an oil and gas lease upon certain lands belonging to her. the Flora Dora Oil Company was organized and proceeded to sell stock to pay for the sum called for in the option and to develop the property. Burford, the plaintiff in error, subscribed to seven shares of stock in this company, but did not pay for it in cash, but paid for it by executing a note to Mrs. Hughes for the sum of $700. This note was applied to the payment on the lease, the remainder…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jones v. Citizens' State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Martin v. Leeper Bros. Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Johnson v. J. J. Douglass Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. City Nat. Bank of Huron, SD v. FullerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  2. White v. HarriganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. St. John v. IversSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. Osenbaugh v. Virgin & Morse Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Hutchinson Gin Co. v. Latimer County Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API