Legal Opinion

Shiflet v. Marley

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1941No. Civil No. 4361PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, C. J.

— This is an appeal by R. C. Shiflet and Leona M. Shiflet, his wife, defendants, from a judgment in favor of May B. Marley, plaintiff. The facts shown by the record are not in serious dispute and may be stated as follows: In March 1931, plaintiff loaned to defendants $6,000, for which they executed a negotiable promissory note payable in three years and bearing interest at 8% per annum, payable quarterly. Concurrently, to secure the payment thereof, they gave plaintiff a mortgage on certain real property in Phoenix, which contained the usual covenants that mortgagors would keep the property…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McCartney ex rel. First National Bank v. KippSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  2. Vawter v. Rogue River Valley Canning Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Cowan v. RamseyArizona Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Ryan v. PistoneNew York Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Independent School District, Class A, Number One v. PorterIdaho Supreme Court · 1924

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Adelman v. ChristyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2000
  2. Fay Corp. v. Bat Holdings I, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1986
  3. United Security Corp. v. Anderson Aviation Sales Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  4. Western Coach Corp. v. RoscoeArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Catalina Groves, Inc. v. OliverArizona Supreme Court · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API