Legal Opinion

Fuller v. Stout

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 24, 1917No. 7954PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from District Court, Creek County; Wade 'S. Stanfield, Judge. Action between C. W. Fuller and others and J. S. Stout and others. There was a. judgment for the latter, and the former bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

COLLIER, O.

An action was commenced by M. S. Karcher et al. against' J. S. Stout et al., and was on final trial consolidated -with two other eases, one of which' was C. W. Fuller et ah, hereinafter styled plaintiff, against several defendants, including the American National Bank of Tulsa,, hereinafter styled the bank, and J. 'S. Stout, hereinafter called defendant, which; said bank answered and filed a cross-petition, praying the foreclosure of a mortgage-given -by Stout and wife to said' bank,’and in which the Bovaird Supply Company, here-r' inafter called intervener, intervened,…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Independent Eastern Torpedo Co. v. GageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  2. Shiflet v. MarleyArizona Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Lincoln National Life Ins. Co. v. RiderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Swift & Co. v. ColvertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Standard Brick Co. v. Venetian Brick Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API