Legal Opinion

Kerr v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 23, 1975No. 1 CA-IC 1046PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OGG, Presiding Judge.

This appeal from a denial of compensation by the Industrial Commission focuses upon the “going and coming rule.”

Appellant Stanley L. Kerr was employed by Sage Communications, Inc., as a lineman and foreman. Sage laid communication cable primarily in California and Arizona; the nature of the work necessitated travel by its employees. Mr. Kerr resided with his family in Las Vegas, Nevada. The job which gave rise to this case was in Show Low, Arizona, approximately 400 miles from Las Vegas.

The workers at the Show Low project worked an eighty-hour shift and then were…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hinojosa v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Butler v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Serrano v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Valerio v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Sloan v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Histed v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  2. H. K. Ferguson Co. v. WilleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Bruce v. Chas Roberts Air Conditioning, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  4. Knoop v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  5. J. D. Dutton, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API