Legal Opinion

Serrano v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1953No. 5746PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHELPS, Justice.

Everado Serrano, hereinafter called petitioner, sustained an injury in an automobile accident while enroute from Davis Dam where he was employed by Grafe-' Callahan Construction Company, to his home in Kingman. The employer will hereinafter be referred to as respondent, and the Industrial Commission as commission. Petitioner filed his petition- with the commission for compensation for the injury sustained which was denied ánd the case comes to us on certiorari.

The facts are that petitioner had begun work for respondent at Davis Dam at 12:30 a. m. on May 23, 1952, the morning…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Voehl v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Swanson v. LathamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
  3. Kobe v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Goodyear Aircraft Corporation v. GilbertArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  5. McCampbell v. Benevolent & Protective Order of ElksArizona Supreme Court · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Histed v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  2. Pauley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  3. H. K. Ferguson Co. v. WilleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  4. City of Phoenix v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Livingston v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1954

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API