Knoop v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EUBANK, Judge.
The only issue before us in this special action review of an award of the Industrial Commission is whether the hearing officer erred by concluding that the subject accident and injury of the petitioner did not arise out of and in the course of her employment. We believe that the hearing officer’s conclusion was incorrect and set aside his award of noncompensability.
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW
The relevant facts are not disputed. At the time of her injury, the petitioner, Mrs. Eunice E. Knoop (petitioner), was employed by International Metals Products (respondent employer),…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Royall v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Butler v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1937
- McCampbell v. Benevolent & Protective Order of ElksArizona Supreme Court · 1950
- Pauley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1973
- Proctor-Silex Corp. v. DeBrickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Smith v. State, Department of Labor & Industrial RelationsHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- Jennings v. Backyard Burgers of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Brooks v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Copeland v. Leaf, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- McCurry v. Container Corp. of AmericaTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.