Legal Opinion

J. D. Dutton, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 6, 1978No. 1 CA-IC 1827PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHROEDER, Presiding Judge.

The question presented in this special action—Industrial Commission is whether the respondent-employee, Raymond W. Dyer, was in the course and scope of his employment when he was injured in an automobile accident while returning home from work.

Dyer was employed by the petitioner-employer, J. D. Dutton, Inc., as a grade foreman on a highway construction project near Greasewood, Arizona. At the time of the accident, Dyer lived approximately 45 miles from the job site in Holbrook, Arizona. Dyer had been working at the construction site for seven weeks and, on…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kobe v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Butler v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Pauley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Serrano v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Strauss v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Christian v. Nicor Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Hansen v. Estate of HarveyIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Smithey v. HansbergerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  4. Waterhouse Water Conditioning, Inc. v. WaterhouseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  5. Brooks v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API