Legal Opinion

Samson Tire & Rubber Corp. v. Rogan

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 30, 1943No. 10201PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The motion of appellant to recall the mandate and re-tax costs against the collector, is well founded. Cf. United States v. Nunnally Invest. Co., 316 U.S. 258, 62 S.Ct. 1064, 86 L.Ed. 1455, 140 A.L.R. 792; Huntley v. So. Oregon Sales, 9 Cir., 104 F.2d 153; United States v. Morrisdale Coal Co., D.C.E.D.Pa., 46 F.Supp. 356; Brauch v. Birmingham, D.C.N.D. Iowa, 49 F.Supp. 229.

The mandate is ordered recalled and the clerk ordered to tax the costs.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Nunnally Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Huntley v. Southern Oregon Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  3. United States v. Morrisdale Coal Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Brauch v. BirminghamDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1943

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Clyde A. Perkins v. Standard Oil Company of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  2. Zipfel v. Halliburton Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. Lichter Foundation, Inc. v. Russell A. Welch, Collector of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
  4. Epsen Lithographers, Inc. v. O'MalleyDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1946
  5. F. M. Williams v. George D. Patterson, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API