Legal Opinion
Huntley v. Southern Oregon Sales, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 24, 1939No. 8501PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANEY, Circuit Judge.
The mandate issued after affirmance of the judgment (9 Cir., 102 F.2d 538), herein recited an affirmance of the judgment, but was silent as to any interest on the judgment below as is usual in such cases, since Rule 26 of this court automatically provides for interest on the “judgment below until the same is paid, at the same rate that similar judgments bear interest in the courts of the State * * * where such judgment was rendered.” Appellee has filed a motion to recall the mandate and modify the same by providing therein that the judgment affirmed shall bear interest at…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- George Moore Ice Cream Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Billings v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- United States v. Jefferson Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Boston Sand and Gravel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Clyde A. Perkins v. Standard Oil Company of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Zipfel v. Halliburton Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Royal Worcester Corset Co. v. WhiteDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1941
- Anglin & Stevenson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
- Samson Tire & Rubber Corp. v. RoganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.