Legal Opinion

United States v. Morrisdale Coal Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 22, 1942No. 337PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

This is an action by the United States upon abatement bond given by the defendant to the Collector, to stay the collection of additional income and excess profit taxes for the years 1917 and 1918, in the total amount of $82,262.01.

Shortly after suit was instituted the surety paid the face amount of the bond into Court and was permitted to withdraw, under an order providing that in the event of a judgment for the plaintiff the money was to go to the plaintiff, and in the event of judgment for the defendant it was to be returned to the surety. Both parties have filed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. George Moore Ice Cream Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. United States v. KalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Sage v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. United States v. John Barth Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. United States v. Nunnally Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Mary StuartCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
  2. United States v. Techno Fund, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1967
  3. Samson Tire & Rubber Corp. v. RoganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
  4. United States v. Adana Mortgage Bankers, Inc. (In Re Adana Mortgage Bankers, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1981
  5. United States v. Morrisdale Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API