F. M. Williams v. George D. Patterson, District Director of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
F. M. Williams sued George D. Patterson, District Director of the Internal Revenue, for a tax refund amounting to $280. The taxpayer was unsuccessful in the district court, successful on appeal. Williams v. Patterson, 5 Cir., 1961, 286 F.2d 333. The taxpayer has now filed a motion to tax the costs of $648.75 to the appellee.
Rule 31 of the Rules of this Court, 28 U.S.C.A., in part, provides:
“3. In cases of reversal of any judgment or decree in this court, costs shall be allowed to the appellant, unless otherwise ordered by the court. The cost of the transcript of the record from the court…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Lichter Foundation, Inc. v. Russell A. Welch, Collector of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
- F. M. Williams v. George D. Patterson, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Samson Tire & Rubber Corp. v. RoganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
- De Bary v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Farnsworth & Chambers Company, Inc. v. Robert L. Phinney, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Troop Water Heater Co. v. BinglerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1964