Legal Opinion
Clyde A. Perkins v. Standard Oil Company of California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 16, 1973No. 71-1515PublishedCited by 132 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KOELSCH, Circuit Judge:
Both parties have requested our instructions with respect to the allowance of interest on certain awards of attorneys’ fees recovered by appellant in the district court and subsequently reduced by us on appeal. 1 The question before us is the construction of “the date of the entry of the judgment,” as provided in the federal post judgment interest statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1961 2
Appellee Perkins prevailed in his private antitrust action against appellant, Standard Oil Company of California, on a decision by the U. S. Supreme Court [Perkins v. Standard Oil Co., 395…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Briggs v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. HoughamSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Perkins v. Standard Oil Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Perkins v. Standard Oil Co. of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc. v. AmiraultCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by132 opinions
- Dependahl v. Falstaff Brewing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Landstar Ranger, Inc. v. PARTH ENTERPRISES, INC.District Court, C.D. California · 2010
- Michael J. Foley v. City of Lowell, Massachusetts, Michael J. Foley v. City of Lowell, MassachusettsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Copper Liquor, Inc., Robert Earl Basham, Jr., of the Estate of Harold Letcher, Deceased, Cross-Appellant v. Adolph Coors Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Twin City Sportservice, Inc. v. Charles O. Finley & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.