Legal Opinion

Olsen v. Holder

District Court, S.D. Iowa

Decided April 27, 2009No. 4:08-cv-00370 RP-RAWPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ROBERT W. PRATT, Chief Judge.

On September 15, 2008, Plaintiff, Carl Olsen, filed an “Original Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief.” Clerk’s No. 1. Plaintiffs action asserts that the current scheduling of marijuana as a Schedule I controlled substance is unlawful under the Controlled Substances Act of 1970 (“CSA”). Specifically, Plaintiff contends that marijuana “no longer meets the statutory requirement for inclusion in Schedule I of the CSA” because several states have determined that marijuana has a legitimate medical use, in contradiction to the CSA’s requirement that a…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Joseph Osborn and Pamela Osborn, Individually and as Father and Mother and Guardians Ad Litem of Shawna Osborn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  3. Titus v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  4. Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v. HirschSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. United States v. RushCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. HicksDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
  2. Hemp Industries Association v. United States Drug Enforcement AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
  3. Kadonsky v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  4. Young v. US Attorney GeneralDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API