Legal Opinion

Young v. US Attorney General

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 9, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2012-1623Published

1Opinion of the Court

FILEo UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MAy _ g p_ FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Clerk u 2013 Court§ f 'S' Dist-"'°l & B-'inkr ) or the Drstnct of coh'jg_'tg'l; David M. Young, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 12-1623 (UNA) ) U..S. Attorney General, ) ) Respondent. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION This action for a writ of mandamus brought pro se by a federal prisoner was dismissed on November 16, 2012, because petitioner had neither submitted the $350 filing fee applicable to this civil action nor complied with the Order directing him to file a six-month trust fund account statement in support of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re: CheneyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  2. Cox v. Secretary of LaborDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1990
  3. United States v. Tony William WablesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  4. Olsen v. HolderDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API