Howard v. State
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PERRY, Judge.
In this case we are asked to determine whether the district court properly denied an application for post-conviction relief, following an evidentiary hearing, wherein Earl Andre Howard claimed he had been rendered ineffective assistance of counsel at sentencing. We determine that there was substantial and competent evidence to support the district court’s ruling, and we affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
In May of 1991, Howard entered a guilty plea to a charge of procurement of prostitution. I.C. § 18-5602. Howard agreed to plead guilty to one count of procurement in exchange for the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Aragon v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. BearshieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
- Paradis v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
- Davis v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Knutsen v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
- Barcella v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2009
- Gonzales v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2011
- Baxter v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2010
- Gilpin-Grubb v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.