Legal Opinion

Gilpin-Grubb v. State

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 2002No. 28391PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Justice.

Petitioner, Laura Gilpin Grubb, appeals the dismissal of her application for post-conviction relief and denial of her motion for reconsideration. Petitioner asserts that her counsel ineffectively assisted her and that there are genuine issues of material facts that should prevent the dismissal of her application for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The facts from Petitioner’s underlying criminal case are stated in State v. Gilpin, 132 Idaho 643, 977 P.2d 905 (Ct.App.1999) as:

Gilpin was driving on a remote highway near Mountain Home, Idaho, [on…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Aragon v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Russell v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Paradis v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Rhoades v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. Timothy Alan DunlapIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Ridgley v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Charboneau v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2007

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API