Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Hampton

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 20, 1975No. Civ. 1944PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN (G. A.), P. J.

Plaintiffs and appellants, T. E. Fisher and Floyd Hall, sued defendant and respondent, L. M. Hampton, for damages for alleged breach of a limited partnership agreement and appeal from a judgment by the court, sitting without a jury, denying relief.

After several preliminary meetings, the plaintiffs as limited partners and defendant as sole general partner executed a certificate of limited partnership on June 18, 1970. The agreement, which was drawn by defendant’s attorney, states in part that: “2. The character of the business intended to be transacted by said…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ernst v. SearleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Gold Mining & Water Co. v. SwinertonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Hollywood Cleaning & Pressing Co. v. Hollywood Laundry Service, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Alder v. DrudisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Gerwin v. Southeastern California Ass'n of Seventh Day AdventistsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Harsha v. State Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  2. Kids' Universe v. In2labsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Gherman v. ColburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. El Fredo Pizza, Inc. v. Roto-Flex Oven Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Bruckman v. Parliament Escrow Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API