Legal Opinion
Forte v. Dillard Paper Co. of Raleigh, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided February 21, 1978No. 7710SC173PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERWIN, Judge.
The plaintiffs urge this Court to hold that there are sufficient, genuine issues of material facts in this case to reverse the trial court’s holding that the defendants are entitled to a judg ment as a matter of the law. We conclude that the summary judgment entered below is improper.
In Pridgen v. Hughes, 9 N.C. App. 635, 177 S.E. 2d 425 (1970), this Court stated at p. 638:
“While neither the federal rules nor the North Carolina rule excludes the use of the procedure in negligence actions, it is generally conceded that summary judgment will not usually be as feasible in negligence…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Page v. SloanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Pridgen v. HughesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- McCombs v. City of AsheboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- Lanier v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
3Cited by3 opinions
- Robinson v. Whitley Moving & Storage, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Whitaker v. BlackburnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Taylor v. Lutz-Yelton Heating & Air Conditioning Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979