Legal Opinion

Forte v. Dillard Paper Co. of Raleigh, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 21, 1978No. 7710SC173PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERWIN, Judge.

The plaintiffs urge this Court to hold that there are sufficient, genuine issues of material facts in this case to reverse the trial court’s holding that the defendants are entitled to a judg ment as a matter of the law. We conclude that the summary judgment entered below is improper.

In Pridgen v. Hughes, 9 N.C. App. 635, 177 S.E. 2d 425 (1970), this Court stated at p. 638:

“While neither the federal rules nor the North Carolina rule excludes the use of the procedure in negligence actions, it is generally conceded that summary judgment will not usually be as feasible in negligence…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Page v. SloanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Pridgen v. HughesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  3. McCombs v. City of AsheboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  4. Lanier v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Whitley Moving & Storage, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Whitaker v. BlackburnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Taylor v. Lutz-Yelton Heating & Air Conditioning Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API