Legal Opinion
Connick v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided September 29, 1995No. 1-94-1275PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hartman
Plaintiffs brought this class action on behalf of all owners and lessees of the Suzuki Samurai, to recover for alleged breaches of warranty, fraud, violation of consumer protection statutes, misrepresentation, and negligent failure to recall. The circuit court dismissed plaintiffs’ amended complaint, second amended complaint, and third amended complaint pursuant to section 2—615 of the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 110, par. 2—615 (now 735 ILCS 5/2—615 (West 1994))).
In order to comply with recently adopted page limitations set forth in Supreme Court…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Board of Education v. A, C and S, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1989
- Kassab v. SoyaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Zimmerman v. Northfield Real Estate, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Szajna v. General Motors Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
- Rothe v. Maloney Cadillac, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1988
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Beverly Cole Anita S. Perkins Jewell P. Lowe v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Chaurasia v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Crichton v. Golden Rule InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Hobbs v. General Motors Corp.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2001
- Gragg v. CalandraAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.