Legal Opinion

Rothe v. Maloney Cadillac, Inc.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1988No. 63693PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cunningham

In the circuit court of Cook County, plaintiff, Paul Rothe, filed a six-count complaint to recover economic losses allegedly suffered as a result of his purchase of a 1982 Cadillac DeVille. Two counts (counts I and II) against the vehicle’s manufacturer, General Motors Corporation (GM), are based on express warranties. These counts were allowed to stand and are not in issue here. Another count (count VI) names both GM and the dealership from which plaintiff purchased the vehicle, Maloney Cadillac, Inc. (Maloney). Count VI, based on the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (Ill.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Szajna v. General Motors Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Rothe v. Maloney Cadillac, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  3. Sunich v. CHICAGO & NW TRANS. CO.Illinois Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Clemens v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Sorce v. Naperville Jeep Eagle, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  3. Collins Co. v. Carboline Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1988
  4. In re Myford Touch Consumer LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  5. Mekertichian v. Mercedes-Benz U.S.A., L.L.C.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API