Legal Opinion

Weiss v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 1926No. Appeal, 329PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Walling,

In the spring and summer of 1921, the plaintiffs, William and Lena Weiss (husband and wife) resided on the third floor of 5836 Market Street, Philadelphia, and on June 1st, of that year, the defendant insurance company issued to them a policy of indemnity against loss of wearing apparel, precious stones, jewelry, etc., by burglary and larceny, not exceeding $4,000. By a rider added three weeks later, the policy was extended so as to cover loss by robbery from the person, and two months later (August 20, 1921) a further rider was added, increasing the amount of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PayneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  2. Commonwealth v. VaranoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  3. Stout v. RasselSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1798
  4. Marshall v. CarrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  5. Zenzil v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. QuarantaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Narciso v. Mauch Chunk TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Hunter v. PopeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Schlossstein Et Ux. v. BernsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Commonwealth v. ArcurioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API