Legal Opinion

Dorris v. Bridgman & Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 18, 1927No. Appeal, 139PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Plaintiff, while standing at a street crossing in the City of Philadelphia, was struck on the head by a section of iron pipe, extending over the side of a passing trailer attached to a tractor belonging to defendant. The pipe was one of a number of sections comprising, with other articles, a load of building material. Plaintiff was quite seriously injured and at the trial received a verdict for $16,710. The court below denied a motion for judgment n. o. v. for defendant but made absolute a rule for a new trial. Defendant appealed.

We have frequently said that we will not reverse the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Class & Nachod Brewing Co. v. GiacobelloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Weiss v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schroeder v. Gulf Ref. Co., (No. 2)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Bard v. BakerMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Stein v. KesslerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API