Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Migala v. Dakin

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 20, 1929No. Docket No. 3757PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESTON (H. L.), J., pro tem.

Plaintiff Keturah T. Mígala brought this action against her former husband, William E. Rickard, to rescind a property settlement made between them on or about May 22, 1922, upon the ground that she was induced to make the settlement through the fraud, deceit, misrepresentations and undue influence of said William E. Rickard.

William E. Rickard died before the case was tried, and Charlotte Rickard Dakin was appointed administratrix of his estate and substituted as defendant in this action in the place and stead of William E. Rickard.

The case was tried by the court…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Wilbur v. WilburCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Locke Paddon v. Locke PaddonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Unser v. UnserNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Collins v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Rhinehart v. RhinehartWyoming Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Kast v. Dubuque Fire & Marine InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Vai v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API