Legal Opinion
Kast v. Dubuque Fire & Marine Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 20, 1931No. Docket No. 4149PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MR. JUSTICE Pro Tem. McDANIEL Delivered the Opinion of the Court.
This action was brought by the plaintiff against the defendants to recover upon a certain policy of fire insurance. Judgment was against the plaintiff and appellant and in favor of the defendants and respondents. After judgment a motion for a new trial was made by the plaintiff on the grounds: 1. That the evidence is insufficient to justify the decision of the court; 2. That the decision is against law; and, 3. On account of errors of law occurring at the trial and excepted to by the plaintiff. The motion for a new trial in due…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stevenson v. Sun Insurance OfficeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Westchester Fire Ins. Co. v. McMinnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Migala v. DakinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Dellarowe v. KirchnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Mercantile Investment Co. v. HowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
3Cited by4 opinions
- Apparel Manufacturers' Supply Co. v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Ohran v. National Automobile Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
- Ohio Cas. Ins. Co. v. Northwestern Mut. Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- Ohio Casualty Insurance v. Northwestern Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971