Legal Opinion

Spenlinhauer v. Spencer Press, Inc.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided December 28, 2011No. 10-P-2105PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAgnes, J.

Under the Massachusetts Business Corporation Act (Act),3 G. L. c. 156D, as appearing in St. 2003, c. 127, shareholders have the right to dissent from a proposed merger and demand that the corporation pay “fair value” for their shares if the merger is accomplished. G. L. c. 156D, § 13.02(a). The principal issue presented by this appeal is whether the trial judge correctly applied the appraisal provision of the Act, G. L. c. 156D, § 13.30, in determining the “fair value” of stock owned by a minority shareholder of a close corporation following a cash-out merger.4 For the reasons that follow, we…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  3. Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  4. Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype Co. of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  5. Kurker v. HellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Flores v. CastaldiMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2013
  2. Baytarian v. Noranda Constr. Mgmt. & Dev. Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2019
  3. DREAM CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANYDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2022
  4. Hernandez-Castro v. O'neillMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
  5. Stacy v. ZhaoMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API