Legal Opinion

Stacy v. Zhao

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided April 3, 2013Published

1Opinion of the Court

Williams, PJ.

Plaintiff-tenants Jennifer Stacy (“Stacy”), Mathew Stacy (“Mathew”), and Brian Mor (“Mor”) brought this action against their landlord, Tony Zhao a/k/a Kun Zhao (“Zhao”), for claimed deficiencies with their apartment. Following a jury-waived trial, the judge found mostly in favor of the tenants on their claims for breach of the implied warranty of habitability, interference with quiet enjoyment, failure to supply hot water, violation of the security deposit statute, violation of G.L.c. 93A, and breach of contract, but for Zhao on their claim of retaliation. Two appeals followed.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Fontaine v. Ebtec Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  2. Deerskin Trading Post, Inc. v. Spencer Press, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  3. Wiedmann v. Bradford Group, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  4. Calimlim v. Foreign Car Center, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  5. Stratos v. Department of Public WelfareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API