Legal Opinion

Baytarian v. Noranda Constr. Mgmt. & Dev. Co.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 28, 2019No. 18-P-889Published

1Opinion of the Court

The parties all were engaged in a residential construction project in the Chestnut Hill area of Newton. The plaintiff, Krikor Baytarian, was hired to supervise and work on the design of the construction project. Baytarian brought an action in Superior Court against Noranda Construction Management & Development Co., LLC, and its owner and manager, George Kouris (collectively, Noranda), to collect unpaid wages and associated damages pursuant to the Wage Act.3 See G. L. c. 149, § 148. After a jury-waived trial, a judge ruled in Baytarian's favor, supporting his rulings with factual findings…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fabre v. WaltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  2. Carey v. New England Organ BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  3. Sebago v. Boston Cab Dispatch, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  4. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc. v. RyanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  5. Cambra v. SantosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API