Legal Opinion

Reyes v. Kenosian & Miele, LLP

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 18, 2008No. C07-00253 MJJPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MARTIN J. JENKINS, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Before the Court are cross Motions for Summary Judgment, one brought by Defendants Kenosian & Miele, LLP, and Kenneth Miele (collectively, “Defendants”) and the other brought by Plaintiff Manuel Reyes (“Plaintiff’ or “Reyes”). (Docket Nos. 29, 83.) Both Motions are opposed. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants’ and Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The instant action presents a debt collection dispute.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Heintz v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sayyed v. Wolpoff & Abramson, LLPDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010
  2. Gallagher v. Gurstel, Staloch & Chargo, P.A.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
  3. Donohue v. NielsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  4. Lowe v. Maxwell & Morgan PCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2017
  5. Donohue v. NielsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API