Legal Opinion
Gallagher v. Gurstel, Staloch & Chargo, P.A.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 29, 2009No. 08-CV-1189 (PJS/RLE)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
PATRICK J. SCHILTZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff Kiara Gallagher brings this action against defendant Gurstel, Staloch & Chargo, P.A. (“Gurstel”) under Minn.Stat. § 571.90 and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692 et seq. This lawsuit arises out of errors made by Gallagher, Gallagher’s bank, and Gurstel, which resulted in Gallagher’s bank account being “over-garnished” by Gurstel. Gurstel has moved for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, Gurstel’s motion is denied in…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Briscoe v. LaHueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Heintz v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Arteaga v. Asset Acceptance, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Gonzalez v. CullimoreUtah Supreme Court · 2018
- Daniels v. Davis Davis Attorneys, P.C., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County2011
- Gonzalez v. CullimoreUtah Supreme Court · 2018
- Wilder v. Credit Control Company IncDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2019