Legal Opinion

Lowe v. Maxwell & Morgan PC

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided September 19, 2017No. CV-15-02481-PHX-DLRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Douglas L. Rayes, United States District Judge

Plaintiff Michael Lowe alleges that Defendant Maxwell & Morgan PC (“M & M”) violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq., by *397attempting to recover post-judgement attorneys’ fees and costs not authorized by Arizona law. At issue is Lowe’s motion for class certification and M & M’s related motion to strike. (Docs. 14, 49.) The motions are fully briefed and the Court heard oral argument on July 14, 2017. For the reasons below, both motions are denied.

BACKGROUND

Lowe formerly owned and resided at real property…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  5. Staton v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ely v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
  2. Norton v. LVNV Funding, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API