Legal Opinion
Donohue v. Nielson
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 3, 2011No. 28060-8-IIIPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
¶1 — Debbie Donohue appeals the trial court’s summary dismissal of her Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692-1692p, claim against Gregory Nielson and/or Gregory A. Nielson PS (collectively Nielson). She contends 15 U.S.C. section 1692g(a) requires all debt collectors to provide validation notice, even if such *608notice has already been provided by an assignor of the debt. We disagree and affirm.
FACTS
¶2 In October 2007, the Children’s Choice, a dental practice, assigned an unpaid dental services account owed by Ms. Donohue to Quick Collect. The assigned amounts were…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- BedRoc Limited, LLC v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Donohue v. Quick Collect, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- City of Spokane v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Paris v. Steinberg & SteinbergDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2011
- Donohue v. NielsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011