Legal Opinion
Rousu v. Collins Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 8, 1931PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.
The compensation commissioner found that the plaintiff entered the employ of the Collins Company in February, 1917, and worked for that company at wet grinding intermittently until September, 1922, an aggregate period of wet grinding of about forty months. From September, 1922, to July, 1924, he was not working for this company, but thereafter he worked at various times for this employer at polishing until December 16th, 1930, when he became disabled through pneumoconiosis with tuberculosis superimposed thereon. The commissioner found that this disability was directly traceable to the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Larke v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Madore v. New Departure Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Esposito v. Marlin-Rockwell CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Franko v. William Schollhorn Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
- Hines v. Norwalk Lock Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Marsh v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Marone v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Rayhall v. Akim Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Crowley's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Stier v. City of DerbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.