Legal Opinion

De La Pena v. Jackson Stone Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 30, 1925PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.

Errors based upon corrections of the finding are not supported by the evidence. Errors pursued in argument are: (1) that the decedent employee did not sustain an injury under our law, and if he did, it did not arise out of and in the course of his employment; (2) that there was no causal connection between his employment and the disease, pneumonia, from which he died. The facts found by the commissioner take the case out of two classes which would concededly support a recovery, pneumonia induced by traumatic agency and an injury peculiar to the occupation. The facts found are comparatively…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Linnane v. Aetna Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  2. Miller v. American Steel & Wire Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  3. Dupre v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  4. Kovaliski v. Collins Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1925

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Marsh v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Pow v. Southern Const. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  3. Madore v. New Departure Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  4. Town of Plainville v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  5. Menzies v. FisherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API