Legal Opinion
Most Worshipful Sons of Light Grand Lodge v. Sons of Light Lodge No. 9
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 19, 1958No. Civ. 17558PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
All defendants appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs. However, it is the appeal of defendant Pride of Richmond Lodge Number 14 Building Corporation 1 which is solely urged. 2
Questions Presented
1. Propriety of court’s action in permitting complaint to be amended seven years after its filing, and in overruling demurrer thereto and denying motion to strike the amended complaint.
2. Sufficiency of evidence to support judgment.
3. Is the action barred by statutes of limitation and laches ?
4. Did the San Francisco Superior Court have jurisdiction ?
Record
In Most Worshipful Lodge v. Sons etc.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Klopstock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Morgan Clark v. MillsapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Erkenbrecher v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Vaughan v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- LeBreton v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Communist Party of the United States of Amerika v. 522 Valencia, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Hennessey's Tavern, Inc. v. American Air Filter Co.California Court of Appeal · 1988
- Wilson v. BittickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. ClausonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Los Angeles City Sch Dist v. Redwood Empire Title Co. of Mendocino Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.