Legal Opinion

Ace Property & Casualty Insurance v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 31, 2004No. 03-470CPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YOCK, Senior Judge.

The plaintiffs seek damages for an alleged breach of Standard Reinsurance Agreements (“SRA”) between them, individually, and the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (“FCIC”). The defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss under Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) arguing: (1) section 1506(d) of the *177Federal Crop Insurance Act (“FCIA”) establishes exclusive and original jurisdiction in the federal district courts over the plaintiffs’ claims, thus withdrawing this Court’s Tucker Act jurisdiction, and (2) the Federal Crop Insurance…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Briscoe v. LaHueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ace Property And Casualty Insurance Company v. Federal Crop Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  2. Jackson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  3. Reilly v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  4. Ferreiro v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  5. Doe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API