Legal Opinion

Ferreiro v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 13, 2006No. 00-648CPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT

FIRESTONE, Judge.

Pending before the court is the motion by the United States government (“government”) for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). The government contends that this court does not *2have jurisdiction to hear this action by the plaintiffs, Teresa Alen Ferreiro (“Ferreiro”), Dorothy Erasmo Jeffers (“Jeffers”), and Mario Vazquez Lopez (“Lopez”) (or collectively, “the plaintiffs”). The plaintiffs are Cuban nationals seeking to recover pension and annuity benefits, which the government…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Lindahl v. Office of Personnel ManagementSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ferreiro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  2. Smalls v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  3. Jackson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  4. Micheal Wayne Long v. the United States 1United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  5. DAVIS v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API