Legal Opinion
Doe v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 30, 2012No. 10-617 CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BUSH, Judge.
Now pending before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, which has been fully briefed and is ripe for a decision by the court. Because the court possesses subject matter jurisdiction over all but one of the claims set forth in the third amended complaint, defendant’s motion to dismiss that complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC) is granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND1
The initial complaint in this matter was filed by plaintiff John Doe on September…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- St. Bernard Parish Government v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Advanced Aerospace Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Coffee Connections, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Smith v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014